April 28, 2017, 07:31:52 pm
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I don't agree with this. That would disable all banners, Adopted glitch pokemon, and other images that everone likes!
QuoteI don't agree with this. That would disable all banners, Adopted glitch pokemon, and other images that everone likes!*cough* Yeah, that's the general idea.But, if GCL forums were to follow by the 'No Image' rule, then I'm sure you're not going to die.Yes, I'm guessing that it probably does sound like a bad idea, but once you start restricting images from signatures and get used to not having them, then it's not as a big of deal as you make it sound.I've been on AF for awhile, and not once have I heard someone complain that they can't have an image in their signature...so it's not like the members are being deprived and forced into giving up something that in my opinion acts as access baggage.And, Missing! NO!, if it's a big deal that you couldn't have adopted glitches in your signature, you could start a thread where you can show off your adopted glitches...that way it's not a total loss
Serebii not strict? This is nothing! But wait, how do I tell if mine is above 700KB?
Quote from: Guy on October 08, 2007, 10:11:49 amSerebii not strict? This is nothing! But wait, how do I tell if mine is above 700KB?Your images aren't anywhere near 700kb.
They're in spoiler tags, so it doesn't matter, right?
Made the signature rules even more unstrict, so you can have looooooooooooooooooooooooooong images and words if you wish.The reason I did that was because SMF has a feature putting long signatures in a horizontal scrollbar.
Page created in 0.103 seconds with 16 queries.