February 17, 2019, 07:41:21 pm
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Chaos on November 14, 2009, 11:27:21 pmQuote from: Adrian Malacoda on November 14, 2009, 11:17:39 pmQuote from: Chaos on November 12, 2009, 08:29:28 amQuote from: Zowayix on November 12, 2009, 03:59:58 amYou can say lulz, just not +4|_|< |_1|<3 +|-|15.Ok, good. Lulz is something I say usually, nowadays."Lulz" isn't leet per se, it's a variety of annoying 4chan-speak.It also isn't a synonym for "luls". Lulz is specifically defined as enjoyment derived from the suffering of others, not just any enjoyment/laughter.Oh...so I've been using it out of context...."Anonymous gets truly epic lulz from raids and invasions."
Quote from: Adrian Malacoda on November 14, 2009, 11:17:39 pmQuote from: Chaos on November 12, 2009, 08:29:28 amQuote from: Zowayix on November 12, 2009, 03:59:58 amYou can say lulz, just not +4|_|< |_1|<3 +|-|15.Ok, good. Lulz is something I say usually, nowadays."Lulz" isn't leet per se, it's a variety of annoying 4chan-speak.It also isn't a synonym for "luls". Lulz is specifically defined as enjoyment derived from the suffering of others, not just any enjoyment/laughter.Oh...so I've been using it out of context....
Quote from: Chaos on November 12, 2009, 08:29:28 amQuote from: Zowayix on November 12, 2009, 03:59:58 amYou can say lulz, just not +4|_|< |_1|<3 +|-|15.Ok, good. Lulz is something I say usually, nowadays."Lulz" isn't leet per se, it's a variety of annoying 4chan-speak.It also isn't a synonym for "luls". Lulz is specifically defined as enjoyment derived from the suffering of others, not just any enjoyment/laughter.
Quote from: Zowayix on November 12, 2009, 03:59:58 amYou can say lulz, just not +4|_|< |_1|<3 +|-|15.Ok, good. Lulz is something I say usually, nowadays.
You can say lulz, just not +4|_|< |_1|<3 +|-|15.
Swearing is allowed...you motherf%@#ers you piece of s$@! you motherf%$&ing b$@#^just kidding
Trashed SCf3's post and the reaction post.
okay leetspeak is okay but a cant write u?that's unfair
You know what? I really think 1337 seems to be a bit stupid. Translation is hard, it is always used by trolls, and it's getting on my nerves. I think it should be banned.
8.Stickies, by their nature, cannot be "bumped" and thus are exempt from this rule.
It looks like the "Bump" rule is missing?Quote from: rules8.Stickies, by their nature, cannot be "bumped" and thus are exempt from this rule.Above it, it doesn't define "Bump"ing, which may make this a bit confusing.