Main Menu
Main Page
New pages
Recent changes
Random page

Arbitrary code execution
Pokémon cloning
Pomeg glitch and Glitzer Popping
Tweaking and voiding
Glitches by generation
Other glitch categories

Disassembly projects
The Big HEX List
Interactive tools
Reference documents

Legendary Star Blob 2 (Hakuda) (日本語/Japanese)
Pokémon Speedruns wiki (English)
PRAMA Initiative (Français/French)
MissingNo. Glitch City (Italiano/Italian)
Become an affiliate!

Site source code

Search Wiki


Search Forums


Author Topic: (Debate) Math is not (100%) logic, only relative logic. Why.  (Read 92 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Evie the Bird Mother 🌸 ☽

  • Veteran Contributor
  • *
  • Online Online
  • Gender: Female
    • View Profile
(Debate) Math is not (100%) logic, only relative logic. Why.
« on: March 19, 2020, 07:32:13 am »
Any supposition of perfection (1+1 'must' equal 2 etc.) assumes higher precision concepts that invalidate material/this/that. We tend to think of infinite and zero as mystical concepts, rather there are alternative axioms that allow them. Example: Overflows? Too large and it goes into negative numbers; yet from a relative perspective, it is not a negative number - it is both positive and negative at the same time (yet it isn't; it depends on the context).  There is also the point, no matter how you try there is always something more precise (Heisenberg's uncertainty principle). If 1 exists 1x1 exists. Note that in this case math is multi-dimensional. Add in the element of time, 1 does not equal 1x1 because it describes 1 as like a 'vector' of 1; by this 1 is being multiplied by 1; an instruction. Add more dimensions and you simulate not math but a program. For the old math system, this appears meaningless; but there could be implications if anyone does make a quantum computer?
Here have some free flowers on every post. ^^
Love, faith, hope are free. If all is lost friends save us.
Thanks fans for Torchic artwork. ♡ First image thanks Nyapon.